By Katya Huzau

There is a mass incarceration problem in the United States. Currently, almost 2 million people are imprisoned—that’s more than any other country in the world. But how exactly did we get here? It all began in the 1970s, when Richard Nixon was in office. President Nixon first introduced the law-and-order, tough-on-crime, and war-on-drugs policies that inspired his two successors—Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton—to sign into law two bills that would see the total population of prisons and jails rise exponentially and further exacerbated the severe racial discrimination and disparity we see within our justice system, of which punishment is an integral component. 

In 1816, a new penal system would emerge out of New York that would influence the design and philosophy of the modern prison system of today—that for punishment to be just, it needs to contain an element of suffering. Taking inspiration for solitary confinement from Philadelphia’s Eastern State Penitentiary, the Auburn System, named after Auburn Prison, was designed to punish the incarcerated through imprisonment itself. Its goal was to humiliate, terrorize, and control prisoners by keeping them under constant surveillance, stripping them of their identity, threatening, and forcing them to spend their days silently working and their nights confined to their cells, which were small and opened out toward central spaces or hallways where guards could constantly keep watch of them.

See more about the Panopticon: a disciplinary theory that heavily inspired the surveillance principle within the Auburn System.
Rona Bitner’s photograph of the cafeteria within Folsom State Prison—built in 1880 in response to the severe overcrowding within San Quentin

Still, not much has changed regarding the architecture of San Quentin’s cell blocks, the last of which was built in 1934. Like most prisons in America, they are designed like fortresses made of concrete and steel, lit by fluorescent light, surrounded by high walls and barbed wire fences, and painted in sterile, cold whites and grays—all of which are clearly represented in Bitner’s photograph. Prison architecture is meant to isolate and dehumanize inmates, and restrict any fostering of community and societal norms, yet we expect them to join society rehabilitated—this is just not possible. 

An average cell within San Quentin’s Adjustment Center, which houses death row inmates deemed too dangerous to be in East Block

Take a virtual tour of San Quentin’s cell blocks

The yard at San Quentin where inmates housed in general population are able go

Prison is a second-by-second assault on the soul, a day-to-day degradation of the self, an oppressive steel and brick umbrella that transforms seconds into hours and hours into days.

Mumia Abu-Jamal, currently serving a life sentence in Philadelphia

If the U.S. intends to encourage reform within its prisons, it needs to incorporate architecture that promotes one’s health, safety, and humanity. As encouraged by the ADPSR, no longer should architects design such spaces that “violate human life and dignity.” Instead, inspiration should be taken from Scandinavian countries, which operate prisons based on the philosophy that community, safety, education, and compassion is needed to create change; and furthermore, are proven to successfully rehabilitate inmates at much higher rates than the U.S.

See Little Scandinavia for yourself
Learn more about Norway’s Halden Prison, deemed the most humane prison in the world

Already, a handful of prisons throughout the U.S. have begun, or plan to, implement design that rejects the “cruel, inhuman [and] degrading” practices of the past, like San Quentin. At Pennsylvania’s SCI Chester, incorporating Scandinavia’s approach to corrections has enabled inmates to “work through trauma [they’ve] experienced with support from other inmates and the officers,” for there’s “more sense of community” that allows “the guys…to look out for each other more, help each other more,” making it clear that rehabilitation stems from humanity. 

css.php