{"id":422,"date":"2023-12-08T20:51:04","date_gmt":"2023-12-09T01:51:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/arth.hamiltonlits.org\/fa-23-110\/?p=422"},"modified":"2023-12-08T20:51:04","modified_gmt":"2023-12-09T01:51:04","slug":"stand-up-straight","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/arth.hamiltonlits.org\/fa-23-110\/uncategorized\/stand-up-straight\/","title":{"rendered":"“Stand Up Straight!”"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The women stand in a line-up; their skin-tight outfits are black to contrast against the white grid used to note their bodily proportions. Individual chalkboards with each woman\u2019s name and a combination of numbers hang above the three women pictured. Though this photograph is not a mugshot or a medical experiment, but rather a supplemental image from an article about gym class. The photograph by Joe Clark appeared in \u201cFun in Phys Ed for Coed,\u201d an article from a 1959 issue of Life <\/em>magazine. Within the same issue of Life<\/em>, there were articles that discussed Civil Rights strikes in Little Rock and the return of the first American astronauts from space; thus, \u201cFun in Phys Ed for Coed\u201d feels a bit out of place. (\u201cCoed\u201d is a term for a female student attending a mixed gender school). The story described an exercise program spearheaded by Janet Wessel at Michigan State University\u2019s Department of Kinesiology. Taken as a demonstration of posture, this photograph reflects the inter-woman comparison inherent to Western ideals of femininity.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Through the use of contrast and precision in arranging the women\u2019s bodies, this photograph exemplifies the pseudoscientific means taken in the pursuit of establishing the bodily proportions of an \u2018average\u2019 or \u2018acceptable\u2019 woman. The photographer, Joe Clark, contends with the figures head-on to produce the most accurate bodily representation. Visible markings on the floor direct where each woman is to stand, positioned equidistant from each other in a formulaic manner. The idea that anatomic normalcy can be determined through physiological measurements, endorsed by historical figures like Alphonse Bertillon, is strongly conveyed through this disturbing image (Sekula, 1986, p. 354). The stark avoidance of gray-tones is apparent, which creates a color palette strictly defined by contrast, seen through the dark clothes relative to the pale wall. Shadows reflected off of the white grid wall add to this eerie (and almost medicinal) atmosphere, an effect enhanced by the women\u2019s uncomfortable facial expressions. The woman on the far right even tilts her head slightly away from the camera, perhaps out of discomfort with her own visibility. Though the title of this article includes the word \u201cfun,\u201d none of these women appear to be enjoying themselves. Their rigid bodies make them seem trapped, not by physical restraints, but by their own visibility within this panoptic display (Foucault, 97). The female subjects of this photograph stand like exhibits; complete with name placards on the wall, these women are presented as bodies in one large display. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Considering the work of Allan Sekula, this image fits within a historical continuum of categorizing people into \u201ctypes.\u201d In this image, the emphasis on comparing women to one another into \u201cbasic body types\u201d is notable, and conveys principles similar to those which Bertillon held (Clark, 1959, p. 92). As the father of the mugshot, much of Bertillon\u2019s photographic work featured tightly framed faces and bodies, a technique reflected in this image. Bertillon\u2019s work reflects the invention of statistical normalcy, \u201cthe average man\u201d (Sekula, 1986, p. 354), who is only normal relative to other men. This photograph can be contextualized within a similar paradigm, in which women\u2019s measurements are pitted against one another to determine who is the most normal and who is the most abnormal. However, it is likely that this photograph is meant to affirm the existence of an \u2018ideal woman,\u2019 evident in its physical setting (a university) and its placement within the magazine (in the \u201cEducation\u201d section). Building off this notion of relative perfection of feminine bodies, each woman is trapped by their constant visibility in a manner similar to Michel Foucault\u2019s panoptical ideas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This photograph exemplifies the social disadvantage placed on women in Western society through its presentation of the female subjects as constricted by their comparative visibility, a notion consistent with Foucault\u2019s ideas about panoptic surveillance. In this image, the subjects are exposed and almost shamed for their bodily differences. In fact, the Life <\/em>article even acknowledges that the exercise program at Michigan State feeds off shame, calling some of the techniques used to assess fitness \u201cembarrassing\u201d for the subjects (Clark, 1959, p. 89). Michigan State P.E. instructors cite the importance of young people knowing which types of exercise can produce \u201cbetter figures.\u201d (Clark, 1959, p. 89). While the text does not explicitly target women with this comment, it is implied since only women appear in the photos that accompany the article.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Furthermore, the caption under this photograph equates posture differences to \u201cfaults,\u201d suggesting that none of the women pictured can naturally achieve the ideal figure. Rather, some disciplinary and corrective force must intervene to produce perfection, a task which necessitates targeted and intrusive surveillance (Foucault, 1977, p. 99). The visibility of the women in this photograph is almost haunting; there is no escape within the vast whiteness surrounding the female subjects, especially their form-fitting, uniformly-colored outfits. Additionally, all women in the photo are Caucasian, which is unsurprising since the image is from 1959. This racially exclusive representation of feminine bodies exemplifies that comparative visibility exists between bodies that are visible and also in the apparent absence of the \u2018other.\u2019 Today, racial divisions continue to define what it means to be a woman.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Though this story dates from 1959, the idea that women must alter their bodies to better fit with cultural standards is still prominent today. Whether through weight-loss advertisements on YouTube or Instagram posts from fitness gurus, women today are constantly bombarded with media that emphasizes their imperfections relative to others. This photograph places these three women as explicit points of comparison; not people, but data. Each woman\u2019s body is defined in comparison to the other, reminiscent of Bertillon\u2019s idea that relative identification makes individuation possible (Sekula, 1986, p. 362). Their comparative visibility traps them, just as the women photographed are frozen and immortalized within this degrading mugshot (Foucault, 1977, p. 98). Between this gym class from 1959 and my own gym class from 2015, the value that society places on bodily comparisons has not changed enough. In my gym class, we performed similar exercises meant to pinpoint our natural weaknesses relative to our peers. Though I never posed for a photograph as a test of my posture, the feeling of constant visibility is strong and reinforced by the everyday misogyny woven into our society. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Especially given the comparative nature of social media, it would be wise to critically consider the meaning and value of comparing feminine bodies. Next time you scroll on TikTok and think about how much thinner or fatter you are than some influencer, consider who benefits from these comparisons. It sure as hell ain\u2019t women.<\/p>\n\n\n\n